S. During post-judgment discussions, Oron informed respondent that it wanted to enter into an agreement to retain respondent for bona fide legal services, which would have the practical effect of conflicting off respondent from ever representing a client in litigation against Oron in the future.
T. Subject to the agreement of Liberty, and Liberty's execution of a written agreement, respondent negotiated a separate agreement with Oron, whereby $75,000.00 of Oron's frozen funds would be released to Oron' s counsel with the understanding, but no guarantee, that such funds would be used to retain respondent as counsel for Oron. This would have the practical effect of potentially conflicting respondent off any future litigation against Oron.
U. On or about August 13, 2012, respondent informed Liberty of the proposed post-judgment agreement by presenting a copy to Liberty's CEO, Jason Gibson, for his review, approval and signature. The Post- judgment agreement encompassed the payment of the $550,000.00 Settlement Amount and Judgment by Oron to Liberty as well as the release of $75,000.00 of Oron's frozen funds to Oron's counsel.
V. On or about August 13, 2012, respondent and Jason Gibson